Reading Matters
"Reading Matters"- yes, I know this pun sounds a little
bit Partridgean- but I like it, so there. I finished a couple
of novels recently which I was impressed by, and I wanted to write some brief
lines about them. The first one was In
Arcadia, by the Nigerian writer Ben Okri. I had not been particularly
impressed by the blurb and the premise for the book (more fool me), but upon reading the first
few pages I quickly became absorbed.
The basic plot of Okri's novel is that a group of TV and
film-makers receive instructions from a mysterious and elusive individual named
Malasso to travel from London to Paris and along the way create a film to mark
aspects of their journey. The book and its themes were inspired by two paintings by Nicolas Poussin: "Et in Arcadia Ego" (Roughly translated, Even in Arcadia, There Am I) and most
notably, the second painting under this title, known also as the "Arcadian
Shepherds", which hangs in the Louvre.
Poussin's painting which is central to the themes of Okri's novel |
Indeed, the Louvre and the painting itself prove to be the final
destination for Okri's group of travellers, or should we say 'pilgrims'. For the
novel is essentially a modern pilgrimage story, and along the way the principal
characters reveal aspects of themselves as they consider the purpose and meaning of existence, the pursuit of happiness in life and what constitutes their own personal "Arcadia" (which could be a material or spiritual utopia). The primary character and principal
narrator is a TV executive named Lao, who begins the novel as angry and
cynical, drinking heavily and behaving obnoxiously to those around him, before
experiencing a spiritual re-awakening. The plot is effectively secondary to
Okri's philosophical discussions and ruminations upon the nature and meaning of
existence. The account of their journey provides a framework for this, and I
found it fascinating and thought-provoking.
The second novel I read was When We Were Orphans by Kazuo Ishiguro. It was a strange, haunting
novel set in Shanghai and London during the 1920s and 1930s, on the eve of the
Second World War. The sole -and unreliable- narrator of this novel is
Christopher Banks, an English detective who grew up in Shanghai. He is forced
to leave China when he is still a child when both his parents mysteriously disappear.
In England, he attends school and reaches adulthood as an orphan, and yet it is
clear the mystery of his parents vanishing influences his choice of vocation as
a detective. After making his name in London and becoming part of high society,
he decides to return to Shanghai and solve the mystery of what happened to
them.
The novel is fascinating because of the sinister undercurrent
that lurks behind and beneath the old-fashioned dialogues and mannerisms of its
protagonists, not to mention Christopher Banks' obviously unreliable
recollections of the past and dubious narration of the present day; at times he
seems to have a fragile grasp upon reality. Old school friends remember him as
strange and silent where he is convinced he had many friends and fully participated
at school; he reacts with anger when told he showed weakness as a child; he
seems to have difficulty trusting women and forming relationships with them; a
young girl whom he adopts and becomes the guardian for, tells him she must
"look after him" when he is older; later on in the novel, he seems
oblivious to the conflict taking place around him between the Chinese and
Japanese soldiers as he desperately searches for his parents; he confuses a wounded Japanese soldier with Akira, his childhood friend from Shanghai- although as readers we are never quite certain of the reality in this instance. There is a
particularly disturbing and tragic scene in the novel at this point, which takes place
within the bombed Chinese slums of Shanghai known as The Warren.
The majority of critics and even Ishiguro himself do not regard
this book as his best work, but I found the novel moving and extremely affecting,
particularly as it reaches its conclusion. The only criticism I would offer is
that occasionally the prose style grated with me: some of the dialogues were stilted as
if extracted from a 1930s black and white film; one or two sections were
unintentionally- not intentionally, surely?- humorous; at times the narrator
Christopher Banks' apparent lack of self-awareness and grasp upon reality
seemed too far-fetched to be convincing. Aside from that, I thought it was a
fine novel- and I found myself still thinking about it after I had put it down.
In fact, that is true for both of the novels I have talked about here, (without
giving away too many crucial spoilers!), and so I would definitely recommend
both of them.
Comments
Post a Comment